In 1999, a gallon of milk cost $2.88. A first-class stamp was 33 cents. The median home price in the United States was $133,300. If you built your retirement budget around those numbers — or even around 2010 numbers, or 2015 numbers — you have already discovered the problem. The dollars you saved are not the dollars you are spending. They just look the same.
Inflation is the retirement risk that no one argues about and almost no one plans for adequately. Unlike a market crash, which is sudden and dramatic, inflation operates by subtraction so gradual it is nearly invisible. You do not wake up one morning to discover your money is worth 40 percent less. Instead, you notice that the grocery bill is a little higher, the insurance premium increased again, and the restaurant you used to visit every Friday now feels like a splurge. The erosion is real. It is relentless. And over a 25- to 30-year retirement, it is devastating.
The math is simple and unforgiving. At just three percent annual inflation — roughly the historical average — a dollar loses half its purchasing power in 24 years. A retiree who needs $5,000 per month today will need approximately $10,000 per month to maintain the same standard of living by age 89. If you retired at 65 with what felt like a comfortable nest egg, that nest egg needs to work twice as hard by the time you reach your late eighties.
This is where the certificate-of-deposit trap ensnares well-meaning savers. After the volatility stories of Editions past, the instinct to seek safety is understandable. CDs feel reliable. They have a stated interest rate. You know exactly what you will receive. But when CD rates hover at four or five percent and inflation runs at three percent, your real return — the only return that matters — is one to two percent before taxes. After federal and state taxes on that interest income, many CD holders are actually losing purchasing power while feeling safe.
The recent spike in inflation has made this tangible in ways that abstract percentages never could. Between January 2020 and December 2023, cumulative inflation exceeded 18 percent. A retiree spending $60,000 per year in 2020 needed approximately $70,800 to maintain the same lifestyle by 2024. Social Security's cost-of-living adjustments helped — they were historically generous during this period — but they do not cover the full gap, particularly for retirees whose spending tilts toward healthcare, housing, and food, all of which inflated faster than the headline number.
There is an honest counterpoint to acknowledge: inflation is not constant, and there have been extended periods of low inflation that provided retirees with meaningful breathing room. The decade from 2010 to 2019 saw average annual inflation of just 1.8 percent, well below the historical average. Planning for the average makes sense, but so does preparing for the spikes. The 1970s and early 1980s, when inflation exceeded 10 percent in multiple years, decimated retirees on fixed incomes. It can happen again.
The most insidious aspect of inflation risk is that it compounds alongside time — and thanks to medical advances, retirees are living longer than any previous generation. A 65-year-old woman today has a 50 percent chance of living past 87 and a 25 percent chance of reaching 93. Planning for a 20-year retirement when you may live 30 years is not conservative. It is dangerous.
The question is not whether inflation will erode your purchasing power. It will. The question is whether your retirement income strategy accounts for that erosion or pretends it does not exist. The answer, for most Americans, is uncomfortably close to the latter.